new blogs, coming soon...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Modern Object-Relations Theory

One critique that I would have of Harry Guntrip's theory of ego, as well as with all object-relations theory, is that it places too much emphasis on the very early mother-child relationship. Certainly, as any parent will attest, a child's personality is in development from the very start. Object-Relations effectively holds the view that if something goes wrong here, you are doomed to a life of ego-failure, but if everything goes well, you develop an iron-clad ego, able to withstand any problem that comes your way. There are several problems with this, not the least of which there are several important personality elements (*cough*sexdrive*cough*) which develop later through biochemical means. Ego development may be hampered early on, but it may also be hampered or disrupted by later environmental effects. Even with the best mother-child relationship, because of the nature of our individual existence, there is no such thing as an un-failable ego. I imagine that child sol...
Read more

Augustine and Property

A paper on Augustine's view of property rights, in which I critique both the traditional interpretation and a salient critique of the traditional interpretation, and briefly offer a model which better represents Augustine's view, that of property as divinely-ordained governance. https://www.academia.edu/2066792/Augustine_and_Property
Read more

Towards a critique of Justice, Rawlsian Liberal Political Theory, and Nation-State Relations (TBC)

"According to Nussbaum, the attempt to secure social cooperation on the basis of mutual advantage for the contracting parties is at the heart of liberal political theory.... Liberalism teaches us to provide an account of justice that does not depend on the presumption of altruism, but rather assumes an admittedly fictive bargaining process that establishes fundamental principles of mutual advantage. The presumption is that people will do the right things if they can see that it really is in their best interest." (85) Hauerwas's critique of liberal political theory hinges on his theological anthropology. LPT assumes a society composed of autonomous rational actors, independent of and prior to any determinative tradition, seeking after their own self-interest, as necessary for an account of justice distributed to the members of said society . (...) Despite such strong critiques of LPT on a person/society scale, LPT is still the dominant mode of thought on a nation-s...
Read more